If you have not read Eragon and Eldest yet, don’t read this! This whole post will be nothing but spoilers!
Read the books instead, then come back and let's discuss!
So, I enjoyed the books, both actually,
Eragon and
Eldest.
Eragon felt a little awkward at the beginning, I’m not sure why, it could have been because Paolini was writing his first few chapters, or it could have been because I was thinking the whole time, “A teenager wrote this!” As we (Paolini and I) got into the story, that awkwardness disappeared.
Well, I have read that Paolini wanted to write a story that followed the standards of epic fantasy: dragons, magic, coming of age and coming to power, and I think he did that well. Most of the story elements were pretty derivative though, there was not a lot that was original. The storyline, intentionally or not, seemed to be lifted directly from
Star Wars (another fantasy story, though many people think it’s SciFi). The boy growing up in an obscure village, who has unknown potential, a grouchy old man to begin his training, but who sacrifices himself for the good of the boy…a war at the end of the first episode, after which the boy goes off to a faraway place for training with a once-powerful and wise trainer…the boy has to leave his training before it’s finished to fight to protect his friends and allies…even the familial connection between himself and his “enemies.” Don’t get me wrong, I actually like the coming of age storyline, it might be one of my favorites in literature. Don’t you think the storyline here was just a little too similar to previous stories, though?
What do you want to bet that the elf dragon riding trainer (what was his name? O-something) will die when he returns to complete his training?
Though I guess someone might argue that Lucas lifted the whole storyline of Star Wars from ancient hero myths, which he learned about from Joseph Campbell (
The Hero with a Thousand Faces), so maybe Paolini did the same thing.
The magic system was not exactly original either, seemed to be taken from Ursula LeGuin’s EarthSea books, where each being has an underlying secret name, and if you can get that name you can control the being. LeGuin’s system did not include grammar though, which was a nice addition. I liked how his blessing of the girl turned out to be a curse because he made a grammatical mistake between the active and passive voice (“be a shield” and “be shielded”). That was a nice touch, and her character is satisfyingly creepy.
I was disappointed with Eragon’s healing at the elf festival. It seemed like a cheap solution to the problem of his back wound, which had built up over hundreds of pages as something that he was struggling with. It would have been more meaningful if he was able to heal it himself with the help of his dragon or friends or something…something to symbolize his emotional damage being healed with the help of his friends. As it was, It seemed too easy, and lost some of its meaning in the story, when he was cured just like that (*snaps fingers*). Who knows, though, maybe my idea would have been too cheesy…
One thing I had questions about too, was Murtaugh’s decision to let Eragon go at the end of Eldest. Why would he do that, what could have been his motivation? While he said he was Galbatorix’s slave, he did not seem to really feel bad about doing his bidding. He said he chose to live and be G’s slave rather than kill himself. So why did he not do G’s bidding and bring capture Eragon, especially when Eragon had just tried to kill him? The only explanation he gives is that he had only sworn to "try" to capture Eragon. He has to know that they will just fight again at some later date. It just seemed to be convenient for the story, not so cohesive with the character's motivations.
I’m kind of tearing the book apart right now, but actually I DID enjoy the books, and can’t wait for the third to come out. I’m just posting these as thoughts to get discussion going…
What did you all think?